![]() ![]() The other window options have some use but in most cases everything you need will be located in the sensors window. Utilities like HWmonitor, Openhardware monitor and Speccy, tend to COMMONLY misreport sensor data, or not report it at all.Īfter installation, run the utility and when asked, choose "sensors only". CPU-Z, GPU-Z and Core Temp all have their uses but HWinfo tends to have it all laid out in a more convenient fashion so you can usually see what one sensor is reporting while looking at another instead of having to flip through various tabs that have specific groupings, plus, it is extremely rare for HWinfo to not report the correct sensor values under the correct sensor listings, or misreport other information. HWinfo is a good way to get that data and in my experience tends to be more accurate than some of the other utilities available. Monitoring temperatures, core speeds, voltages, clock ratios and other reported sensor data can often help to pick out an issue right off the bat. Run HWinfo and look at system voltages and other sensor readings. When starting HWinfo after installation, always check the box next to "sensors only" and de-select the box next to "summary". HWinfo is great for pretty much EVERYTHING, including CPU thermals, core loads, core temps, package temps, GPU sensors, HDD and SSD sensors, motherboard chipset and VRM sensor, all of it. They are also almost religiously kept up to date.ĬoreTemp is great for just CPU thermals including core temps or distance to TJmax on older AMD platforms. I've found HWinfo or CoreTemp to be the MOST accurate with the broadest range of chipsets and sensors. Some are actually grossly inaccurate, especially with certain chipsets or specific sensors that for whatever reason they tend to not like or work well with. Lots of threads and youtube videos explaining how these functions work and what behaviour to expect.HWmonitor, Open hardware monitor, Realtemp, Speccy, Speedfan, Windows utilities, CPU-Z, NZXT CAM and most of the bundled motherboard utilities are often not the best choice as they are not always accurate. You'll have to observe how your chip reacts to different targets or steps in voltage. You're always playing with algorithm (Precision boost) so it's not so simple to OC. ![]() If you want to mitigate some heat, tweak the fan curve (easy), play with Curve Optimizer, or go into Precision Boost Overdrive 2 (PBO2) settings and manually reduce some limits. So even throwing large AIOs and custom loops will see it hit high temps under full load. ![]() As it indicates you have good coverage and excess is simply spilling over.ĥ800X has a really high heat density. Seeing excess paste is better than not IMO. You can always try remounting but I don't think you'll see much of a difference. Remember, Zen will aggressively clock itself (Precision boost) if there is headroom (power/thermals) to do so. As long as this is not a CPU rendering rig, that air cooler will be fine. I'm not seeing thermal throttling kicking in to the point where its impacting performance. Good news is that your score is good and on par with most 5800X (~15000). It'll do the job in most instances but when you put it under full load in benchmarks, it may begin to buckle. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |